Featured Stories
-
Collaboration with OEMs Advances Mono-material Packaging Solutions
Flexible packaging is incredibly versatile, providing manufacturers with a wide variety of sizes and dimensions, structures and features to... -
Enhancing Sustainability in Flexible Packaging through Latex Binders
Evolving government regulations and consumer demands continue to drive interest in sustainable packaging materials. -
It's All About Adhesion A Simple Guide to Corona Treatment
Corona treatment has come a long way since Verner Eisby, the founder of Vetaphone, invented it in 1950.
News | New Products
-
ELBA’s SA-V machine: efficiency and innovation at the service of your business
Technologically advanced and engineered to run at high speeds, the SA-V automatic machine...
-
GFI Ink Dispensing System drives precision for impressive results at Colbert Packaging Corporation
Colbert Packaging Corporation has a long history of satisfying customers.
-
Join Megadyne at ICE Europe 2025: What’s Next for Paper and Print Manufacturing?
In the fast-paced world of paper and print manufacturing, every component of the production line is crucial to keeping operations running smoothly.
-
2025 Trends Shaping the Label Industry
Brand owners rely on converters to help them bring their packaging visions to life and to help meet their business goals.
-
IPCO at European Coatings 2025
Industrial process systems company IPCO will use European Coatings Show – Hall4, Stand 618
-
Expanded Valmet Technology User Group Conference offers insights on optimizing production efficiency and product quality
Valmet recently hosted the Valmet Technology User Group (VTUG) Conference.
-
FPA Announces the 2025 Flexible Packaging Achievement Award Winners
The Flexible Packaging Association (FPA), the leading advocate and voice for the growing U.S. flexible packaging industry
Expert Advice
Supreme Court Decision Gives Employers Leeway in ADA
- Published: August 01, 2002, By Sheila A. Millar, Attorney-at-Law, Keller & Heckman, Washington, DC
In the third of recent, important decisions involving the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), the US Supreme Court unanimously ruled the ADA allows an employer to refuse to hire a person with a disability where that disability poses a direct threat to the individual when performing a job. The case is Chevron USA Inc. v. Echazabal.
Decisions addressing the scope of the ADA are critically important to converters, suppliers, and their customers, whose facilities may involve exposure to chemicals or other materials potentially harmful to individuals with certain medical conditions, or whose disabilities may impair their ability to do a job safely.
The facts of the case decided by the high court are as follows: The employee, Mario Echazabal, worked for a contractor of Chevron USA Inc. In 1996 Mr. Echazabal applied for employment directly with Chevron. The oil giant offered Mr. Echazabal employment, conditioned upon successfully completing a medical exam. The testing physician found liver damage and said continued exposure to toxins at the Chevron facility would lead to further liver damage.
Chevron withdrew its offer of employment to Mr. Echazabal and informed the contractor, Mr. Echazabal's employer, either to reassign him to a job that would not involve exposure to potentially damaging toxins or to remove him from the refinery. The contractor laid off Mr. Echazabal, and he filed suit against Chevron, alleging it violated the ADA.
The Supreme Court ruled an employer may refuse to hire an individual if, based on a reasonable medical judgment regarding that individual's medical condition, his disability would create or aggravate a danger to his own safety or health on the job.
Moreover, the Court noted, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) requires an employer to actively ensure it provides a safe and healthful workplace. If Chevron were required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to hire persons like Mr. Echazabal, then compliance with OSHA would conflict with the ADA, a result at odds with workplace safety objectives.
The unanimity of the decision is an especially important factor, suggesting rare agreement on the fundamental principle that employers may take into consideration a prospective employee's medical condition in determining the appropriateness of employment.
What should converters do?
A converter, supplier, or customer may require employees to meet physical and medical criteria, and may set those requirements as conditions upon which employment offers are made. However, those criteria must be applied to an individual based on a reasonable medical judgment of that individual.
Arguably, the ADA requires an employer to reassign an individual such as Mr. Echazabal to a position that would not endanger his safety or health, provided doing so would not be an undue burden. If no other job is available, an employer may refuse to hire that employee.
The Court addressed a number of important issues not discussed here; ADA requirements and the Chevron case's assessment of them involve complex issues. Members of the converting industry should be sure to review carefully hiring and accommodation decisions with experienced labor specialists to be sure they are adhering to the applicable requirements.
Sheila A. Millar, a partner with Keller and Heckman LLP, counsels both corporate and association clients. Contact her at 202/434-4143; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; PackagingLaw.com